Skip to content
GUIDE · DEADLINES

How long do I have to file an age discrimination claim?

THE SHORT ANSWER

Age claims run on two clocks. The federal ADEA gives you 180 days, extended to 300 days only where a state law bans age discrimination and a state agency enforces it. California, Texas, Washington and Nevada all qualify. The state clocks differ: California allows three years, Nevada 300 days, Texas 180 days, and Washington six months at the state agency.

In this guide
Need help with a discrimination issue?
Request a free case review →
About 2 minutes · No cost or obligation

Who is protected? In all five states, workers 40 and older

Every one of these laws draws the line at 40. The federal ADEA protects "applicants and employees who are 40 years of age or older." California defines age as "the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday." Texas says its age provisions "apply only to discrimination against an individual 40 years of age or older." Washington reaches an employer who acts "because an individual is forty years of age or older." Nevada takes the same line from the other direction: it is not an unlawful practice to act on age "if the person is less than 40 years of age." Colorado draws the line in the same place: the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act protects workers 40 and older, and unlike the federal ADEA's 20-employee minimum, it covers Colorado employers of all sizes.

If you are under 40, being passed over for someone older is not an age claim under these statutes. That is worth knowing before you spend a filing window on it.

Sources [1] · [2] · [3] · [4] · [5] · [6]

The federal 300-day extension has an age-only condition

For most grounds, the EEOC window stretches from 180 to 300 days when a state or local agency enforces a law banning the same kind of discrimination. Age is the exception. The EEOC says the age filing deadline is "only extended to 300 days if there is a state law prohibiting age discrimination in employment and a state agency or authority enforcing that law," and that the deadline is "not extended if only a local law prohibits age discrimination."

California, Texas, Washington and Nevada each have a state age-discrimination statute and a state agency that enforces it, so 300 days is available in all four. Do not carry that assumption to a city ordinance somewhere else. For age, a municipal ordinance and a city commission do not buy you the extra 120 days.

One more federal-only quirk matters here. The ADEA covers private employers with 20 or more employees, while Title VII and the ADA start at 15. A worker at a 17-person company can have a state age claim and no federal one at all, which makes the state deadline the only one that matters.

Warning for federal workers: one group is not on this calendar at all. The EEOC's own note says federal employees and job applicants have a different complaint process and generally must contact an agency EEO Counselor within 45 days, and that the limit can be extended in certain circumstances. If you work for a federal agency or applied to one, the numbers above are not yours. Age claims also come with a second federal route that skips counseling entirely, described further down. Ask your agency's EEO office for the counselor contact today, and get advice the same week.

Sources [7] · [8]

DON'T WAIT TOO LONG
Every claim has a filing deadline, and some are short.
A free, private review tells you where you stand.

The five state windows, and where they diverge

California is the longest. A FEHA complaint has to be filed with the Civil Rights Department within three years of the unlawful practice, and the agency tells workers to submit an intake form "within three years of the date you were last harmed."

Texas is the shortest and the least forgiving. A complaint must be filed "not later than the 180th day after the date the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred," and the statute goes on to say the commission "shall dismiss an untimely complaint." Texas does have a 300-day window, but the statute limits it to sexual harassment. It does nothing for an age claim.

Washington sets six months to file with the Human Rights Commission, and the six months is harder to satisfy than it sounds. What you submit through the online portal is an intake questionnaire. Commission staff then draft a perfected charge that you have to review and sign, and the commission says all of that has to happen inside the six-month limitations period to protect your filing rights. It also reports an eight-to-ten-week backlog before a new complaint reaches an intake investigator. Submitting a questionnaire in month five is not the same as having filed. Washington separately lets an injured worker sue directly in court without going to the agency first, which is a genuinely different route rather than a longer version of the same one.

Nevada allows 300 days to file an employment complaint with the Equal Rights Commission, and its statute adds that a complaint "is timely if it is filed with an appropriate federal agency within that period."

Colorado allows 300 days to file with the Colorado Civil Rights Division, a window a 2022 law (HB22-1367) extended from six months, so older six-month guidance is out of date. CADA generally requires finishing the CCRD process before a lawsuit, and after a right-to-sue notice a civil action generally must be filed within 90 days.

Sources [9] · [10] · [3] · [11] · [12] · [13] · [14] · [15] · [16]

Age cases have their own rule about going to court

Under most federal employment laws you wait for a Notice of Right to Sue. Age is different. The EEOC says that under the ADEA you "don't need a Notice of Right to Sue to file a lawsuit in court," and you can sue "any time after 60 days have passed from the day you filed your charge," but no later than 90 days after notice that the investigation has concluded.

Federal employees have a second age-only route, and it is easy to miss. The EEOC's federal sector procedures state that under the ADEA an individual may go directly to federal court after giving the EEOC notice of intent to sue, instead of running the agency EEO complaint process. The ADEA sets the timing for that notice. The notice must be filed within 180 days after the alleged unlawful practice occurred, and the suit cannot start until at least 30 days after the notice goes in. Read those two numbers correctly. The 180 days is the deadline to GIVE NOTICE, not a deadline to sue, and the 30 days is a minimum waiting period, not a second deadline. Nothing here says the lawsuit itself must be filed by day 210. Someone who initiates the agency process instead keeps the ordinary civil-action windows. Pick a lane with advice, because the counseling deadline is 45 days and the notice deadline is 180.

The state court clocks are not the same as the federal one. In California you have one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice. In Texas you have 60 days after receiving the notice of right to file a civil action, and no state suit may be brought later than two years after the complaint was filed. In Nevada you have 90 days from receipt of the right-to-sue notice. Washington's direct-suit route does not require a notice at all.

Sources [17] · [18] · [19] · [3] · [6]

If a layoff came with a severance packet, read the dates

Age cases and severance paperwork travel together, because older workers are often the ones handed an agreement on the way out. Federal law sets minimum timing for any waiver of age claims. The EEOC says a valid waiver must give the employee at least 21 days to consider the offer, or 45 days in a group layoff program, and must give seven days to revoke a signature. That seven-day revocation period cannot be shortened by agreement.

A signature does not close the door to the agency. The EEOC's guidance states that no agreement between you and your employer "can limit your right to testify, assist, or participate in an investigation, hearing, or proceeding conducted by the EEOC," and that any such provision is invalid and unenforceable.

The filing clocks above keep running while you think it over. Twenty-one days of a 180-day Texas window is a meaningful fraction of it.

Sources [20]

Questions, answered.

My employer has 18 employees. Do I still have an age claim?

Possibly, but not a federal one. The EEOC says a private employer is covered on age only with 20 or more employees, and that 18 is a real gap, because the same page puts the threshold at 15 for race, sex, disability and the rest. So an 18-person employer can be reachable on other grounds and out of reach on age. State law is the place to look. The EEOC notes that an employer it cannot reach may still be covered by a state or local law. California starts at five employees, Washington at eight, Texas and Nevada at 15, and Colorado's CADA covers employers of all sizes, so all five states reach an 18-person employer. That makes the state filing window the deadline that matters. Check it early.

Source [21] · [1] · [2] · [22] · [23] · [24]

Does the 300-day EEOC deadline apply to me in Texas?

Texas has a state age-discrimination law and a state agency that enforces it, so the 300-day federal window is available. That does not change the separate Texas state deadline, which is 180 days for an age complaint.

Source [7] · [25] · [26]

I already signed a severance agreement. Is it too late to do anything?

Not necessarily. The waiver has to meet specific requirements to be valid, and even a valid waiver cannot stop you from filing a charge with or participating in an EEOC proceeding. Have someone read the actual document before you assume it ended things.

Sources

  1. EEOC fact sheet on age discrimination ↗
  2. Cal. Gov. Code § 12926(b) (definition of age) ↗
  3. Tex. Lab. Code § 21.101 ↗
  4. RCW 49.44.090 (age, forty and older) ↗
  5. RCW 49.60.205 (age discrimination limitation) ↗
  6. NRS 613.350 (exceptions) ↗
  7. EEOC, Time Limits for Filing a Charge ↗
  8. EEOC, Overview of Federal Sector EEO Complaint Process ↗
  9. Cal. Gov. Code § 12960(e)(5) ↗
  10. California Civil Rights Department, complaint process ↗
  11. RCW 49.60.230(2) ↗
  12. RCW 49.60.030(2) (civil action) ↗
  13. Washington State Human Rights Commission, employment ↗
  14. NRS 233.160(1)(b) ↗
  15. Colorado Civil Rights Division, complaint process ↗
  16. Colorado General Assembly, HB22-1367 ↗
  17. EEOC, Filing a Lawsuit ↗
  18. EEOC, Appendix II Federal Sector EEO Complaint Processing Procedures (ADEA: proceed directly to court after notice of intent to sue) ↗
  19. ADEA § 15(d) (30 days' notice of intent to sue; notice filed within 180 days of the alleged unlawful practice) ↗
  20. EEOC, Understanding Waivers of Discrimination Claims in Employee Severance Agreements ↗
  21. EEOC, Coverage of Business/Private Employers (20 or more employees for age; 15 or more for race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability or genetic information; an employer EEOC cannot reach "still may be covered by a state or local anti-discrimination law") ↗
  22. RCW 49.60.040(11) ("Employer" includes any person acting in the interest of an employer, directly or indirectly, who employs eight or more persons) ↗
  23. Tex. Lab. Code § 21.002(8)(A) (15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks) ↗
  24. NRS 613.310(2) ("Employer" means any person who has 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks) ↗
  25. Tex. Lab. Code § 21.051 (age is a protected basis) and § 21.202(a) (complaint due by the 180th day) ↗
  26. Texas Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division (enforces Texas Labor Code, Chapter 21) ↗
Call Free case review

Discuss your situation with an employment attorney.

Answer a few brief questions about your workplace matter. Every submission is reviewed by the firm, and potential matters are reviewed by an attorney. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship; that begins only if the firm agrees in writing to represent you.

Free initial review · Private intake